Impact of random and systematic recall errors and selection bias in case--control studies on mobile phone use and brain tumors in adolescents (CEFALO study).

Abstract
Whether the use of mobile phones is a risk factor for brain tumors in adolescents is currently being studied Case control studies investigating this possible relationship are prone to recall error and selection bias We assessed the potential impact of random and systematic recall error and selection bias on odds ratios ORs by performing simulations based on real data from an ongoing case control study of mobile phones and brain tumor risk in children and adolescents CEFALO study Simulations were conducted for two mobile phone exposure categories regular and heavy use Our choice of levels of recall error was guided by a validation study that compared objective network operator data with the self reported amount of mobile phone use in CEFALO In our validation study cases overestimated their number of calls by 9 on average and controls by 34 Cases also overestimated their duration of calls by 52 on average and controls by 163 The participation rates in CEFALO were 83 for cases and 71 for controls In a variety of scenarios the combined impact of recall error and selection bias on the estimated ORs was complex These simulations are useful for the interpretation of previous case control studies on brain tumor and mobile phone use in adults as well as for the interpretation of future studies on adolescents
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections